You are viewing a free preview lesson. Enroll to access all content. Enroll Now
Course Content
Free preview | Enrollment required
Thông tin chung 0/6
Link tải workflow và lệnh backup tự động trên window được chia sẻ từ OTAVN
1.0.1 Introduction to n8n and its real-world applications
1.0.2 Some platforms similar to n8n
1.0.3 Comparing n8n and Make.com
1.0.2 Overview of the menu and features in n8n
3 minutes
1.1 Some tasks with cloning or exporting Workflows
3 minutes
Previous Next

Both n8n and Make.com (formerly Integromat) are workflow automation platforms that help you connect applications and services flexibly without complex programming. However, they have important differences.

1. Overview

Criteria n8n Make.com
Structure Open-source, self-hostable SaaS Service (Cloud-based)
Interface Flow-based, deeply customizable Intuitive interface, easy to use
Pricing Model Free when self-hosted, paid plans available Paid plans only (free version is heavily limited)
Integrations Many webhooks, REST APIs Over 1,500 built-in integrations
Performance Depends on your server Pre-optimized on the cloud platform
Customizability High, supports JavaScript code in workflows Limited to available features
Community & Support Strong, many developer contributors Professional support, detailed documentation

2. Comparison Details

2.1. Deployment & Scalability

  • n8n: As it is open-source, you can install it on VPS, Docker, or self-host for complete data control. This is suitable for businesses wanting internal data security.
  • Make.com: Runs entirely on the cloud, no installation needed, easy to use, but you depend on their servers.

➡ Choose n8n if you want full control over the system. ➡ Choose Make.com if you want an easy-to-use solution without server maintenance.

2.2. Integration & Flexibility

  • n8n: Supports over 300 apps, but you can easily create custom nodes via API or JavaScript.
  • Make.com: Supports over 1,500 apps, with more built-in integrations, but less customization via code.

➡ Choose Make.com if you want many popular integrations available without coding. ➡ Choose n8n if you want deep customization and easy API integration.

2.3. Interface & User Experience

  • n8n: Flowchart-style (drag-and-drop) interface, but can be slightly difficult for beginners.
  • Make.com: More accessible interface, showing detailed steps, more intuitive.

➡ Choose Make.com if you prefer a user-friendly, intuitive interface. ➡ Choose n8n if you want maximum customization and don't mind a more complex interface.

2.4. Performance & Limits

  • n8n: If you self-host, performance depends on the server. With a good configuration, it can run infinitely.
  • Make.com: Limited by subscription plan, may be restricted by the number of runs (operations).

➡ Choose n8n if you want to run unlimited workflows at a low cost. ➡ Choose Make.com if you don't want to manage servers and accept the limitations.

2.5. Pricing

  • n8n: Free if self-hosted. If using the cloud version, prices start from $20/month.
  • Make.com: Has a free version but it's very limited. Pro plans start from $9/month, Enterprise plans can go up to hundreds of dollars/month.

➡ n8n is cheaper if you self-host. ➡ Make.com is suitable if you don't mind paying for a smoother experience.

3. Conclusion: Should you choose n8n or Make.com?

Case Choose n8n Choose Make.com
You want to self-host, data security ✅ ❌
You want to use many built-in integrations ❌ ✅
You have technical knowledge, like API customization ✅ ❌
You want an easy-to-use interface, no coding required ❌ ✅
You need to save costs ✅ (if self-hosted) ❌

? If you are a developer or a business wanting full system control, choose n8n. ? If you are a marketer, small business, or want to simplify automation processes, choose Make.com.